All Issue

2019 Vol.6, Issue 1 Preview Page

Review Article

Introduction and Application of Conceptual Framework and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Applied Ecological Engineering

응용생태공학에서 생태계서비스의 개념틀과 평가체제의 도입과 활용

Wooyeong Joo1
,
SoEun Ahn2
,
Jin Chul Joo3
,
Dong-Gil Cho4
,
Gwon Soo Bahn5
,
Jinho Jung6
,
Kyoung Hak Hyun7*
주 우영1
,
안 소은2
,
주 진철3
,
조 동길4
,
반 권수5
,
정 진호6
,
현 경학7*
1National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 33657, Republic of Korea
2Korea Environment Institute, Sejong 30147, Republic of Korea
3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea
4Nexus Environmental Design Co., Uiwang 16006, Republic of Korea
5K-water, Water Environmental Management Department, Daejeon 34350, Republic of Korea
6Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 20841, Republic of Korea
7Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
1국립생태원 융합연구실
2한국환경정책･평가연구원 지속가능전략연구본부
3한밭대학교 건설환경공학과
4넥서스환경디자인연구원
5한국수자원공사 물환경처
6고려대학교 환경생태공학부
7연세대학교 건설환경공학과
* Corresponding Author
31 March 2019. pp. 69-76
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Ecosystem services are contributing to human welfare by enabling us to maintain our survival and quality of life. A metod of quantifying ecological functions is needed. We discussed the introduction and applications of ecosystem services to applied ecological engineering. The concept and assessment system of ecosystem services were applied to the economic valuation of river, the construction of blue-green-white network in urban area, ecological restoration, and integrated water management in Korea. The conceptual framework and assessment of ecosystem services can be used to promote value of ecological protection and restoration, helping stakeholders understand the benefits of ecosystems and increasing applications of the applied ecological engineering.

Keywords
Blue-green-white network
Ecological engineering
Ecological restoration
Ecosystem service
Integrated water management

생태계는 우리의 생존과 삶의 질을 유지할 수 있게 하여 인간 복지에 직, 간접적으로 기여하고 있다. 그래서 생태적 기능의 계량화 방법이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 응용생태공학에 생태계서비스를 도입하고 적용하는 것에 대하여 논의하였다. 하천의 경제적 가치, 도시 블루-그린-화이트 네트워크 구축, 생태복원 및 통합 물관리에 생태계서비스 개념 및 평가체계를 적용할 수 있는 방안을 모색하였다. 생태계서비스 개념 틀과 평가는 이해해당사자의 생태계 혜택 이해에 도움을 주고 응용생태공학 적용을 증가시켜 생태적 보호와 복원 가치의 증진에 이용될 수 있다.

키워드
블루-그린-화이트 네트워크
생태공학
생태복원
생태계서비스
통합 물 관리
References
1
Ahn, S. and G. Kim. 2016. Economic values of freshwater ecosystem services from demand and supply perspectives. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers 38: 580-587. (in Korean)
10.4491/KSEE.2016.38.10.580
2
Alexander, S., Aronson, J., Whaley, O. and Lamb, D. 2016. The relationship between ecological restoration and the ecosystem services concept. Ecology and Society 21: 34.
10.5751/ES-08288-210134
3
Ban, Y. W. 2012. Master plan for Eco-complex Cheong-Ju City, Korea.
4
Blew, R.D. 1996. On the definition of ecosystem. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 77: 171-173.
5
CBD (the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Strategy Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. COP 10 Decision UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2. Nagoya, Japan.
6
CBD (the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2014. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Montréal, Canada.
7
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I and Turner, R.K. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152-158.
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
8
EU (European Commission). 2011. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.
9
IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2018. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental Science- Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
10
Joo, W.Y., Kwon, H.S., Jang, I.Y., Bae, H.J., Jung, P.M., Bang, E.J., Kim, J.I., Kim, M.H., Kim, M.Y., Park, E. and Kim, J. 2017a. Establishment of Ecosystem Services Assessment Framework at National Level. National Institute of Korea. Seochun, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
11
Joo, W.Y., Kwon, H.S., Jang, I.Y., Bae, H.J., Jung, P.M., Bang, E.J., Kim, J.I., Kim, M.H., Kim, M.Y., Park, E. and Kim, J. 2017b. A Guideline for Korea National Ecosystem Services Assessment. National Institute of Korea. Seochun, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
12
Kim, J.-G. and Lee, W.-K. 2015. Task and curriculum contents of applied ecological engineering education. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2: 1-11. (in Korean)
10.17820/eri.2015.2.1.001
13
Kwon, H.S., Lee, J., Kim, I., Kim, S., Kim, B., Kim, H., Lee, J., Oh, H., Joo, W., Park, E. and Kim, J. 2017. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services. National Institute of Korea. Seochun, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
14
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC., USA.
15
Mitsch, W.J. 1998. Ecological engineering - the 7-year itch. Ecological Engineering 10: 119-130.
10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00009-3
16
Mitsch, W.J. 2012. What is ecological engineering? Ecological Engineering 45: 5-12.
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.013
17
Mitsch, W.J. and Jørgensen, S.E. 2003. Ecological engineering: a field whose time has come. Ecological Engineering 20: 363-377.
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.05.001
18
NCB-ME (Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment in Japan). 2016. Japan Biodiversity Outlook 2. Tokyo, Japan.
19
Odum, H.T. 1962. Man in the ecosystem. In, Proceedings of Lockwood Conference on the Suburban Forest and Ecology. Bulletin of the Connecticut Agricultural Station 652: 57-75.
20
Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Xiao, Y., Polasky, S., Liu, J., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Xiao, Y., Rao, E., Jiang, L., Lu, F., Wang, X., Yang, G., Gong, S., Wu, B., Zeng, Y., Yang, W. and Daily, G.C. 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352(6292): 1455-1459.
10.1126/science.aaf229527313045
21
Park, J., Jung, J., Nam, K., Lee, A.-R. and Cho, K.-H. 2015. The current status and the improvement of ecological engineering education in South Korean universities. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2: 12-21. (in Korean)
10.17820/eri.2015.2.1.012
22
Pecl, G.T., Araújo, M.B., Bell, J.D., Blanchard, J., Bonebrake, T.C., Chen, I.C and Falconi, L. 2017. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355(6332): eaai9214.
23
TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
24
UK NEA (National Ecosystem Assessment). 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
25
UN (United Nations). 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Document A/RES/70/1. the UN Sustainable Development Summit, New York, USA.
26
Wegner, G. and Pascual, U. 2011. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change 21: 492-504.
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.008
27
Yu, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Xu, D. and Cao, S. 2018. Evaluating the net value of ecosystem services to support ecological engineering: Framework and a case study of the Beijing Plains afforestation project. Ecological Engineering 112: 148-152.
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.017
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :응용생태공학회
  • Journal Title :Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
  • Journal Title(Ko) :응용생태공학회 논문집
  • Volume : 6
  • No :1
  • Pages :69-76
  • Received Date : 2019-03-14
  • Revised Date : 2019-03-19
  • Accepted Date : 2019-03-19
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2019.6.1.069
Journal Informaiton Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close